data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3f952/3f9522dca9c2c5d870c89b98b094a1ab8c6879eb" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cbb8c/cbb8c20bee4bfab5a019e9b232279e76ec302f40" alt=""
Old masonry commercial buildings that have long since lost their usefulness have been retasked into blank canvases for murals and private gardens. This local example is the most creative adaptive reuse i have seen in this city yet. In a town and country that prides itself on demolishing anything it had ever built, John George's gut instincts should be a lesson for planners, developers and architects the world over. Its a simple lesson, and one that seems to be lost even on the next generation of planners and new urbanists. As cries of demolition and destruction of the past sixty to one hundred years of history seem to be growing louder and more pronounced, this man simply builds on what is already there.
Energy is a precious thing. The energy to build structures in the first place should not be taken for granted. No matter how misguided their pursuits. The energy spent to demolish a structure should be considered only as an end all, be all last resort. In fact, the act should be criminalized unless cities and municipalities can prove that all other options have been taken. But, not just for the site of the existing building, but for the entire city. This is especially true in Detroit. In a city with miles and miles of vacant land, our leaders and our citizens fixate on existing structures as barriers to progress. The real barrier to progress is not promoting growth and accountability of private property holders. We need to give reasons to build, not to tear down.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1db3a/1db3a9ec2379b57079add3c13c52c3f24b58e6b1" alt=""
###
No comments:
Post a Comment